Fusion, December 30, 2015
By Ari Phillips
When you step out your front door and catch a breath of fresh air, how does that taste? When you look at the nearby trees, what are you really seeing? When you smell the flowers, what is that smell?
That is nature, and it feels good to be in it. This goodness of nature is more than just a mixture of senses and feelings though, it’s also a growing science. In 2015, a number of insights reiterated what we already know: that we don’t spend enough time outside.
These days the average American spends 93% of their life inside; 87% in buildings and 6% in vehicles. A study by the Harvard School of Public Health determined that American adults do indeed spend less time outside on average, less than 5% of each day, than they do in vehicles. As humanity gathers in cities and around screens, time spent outdoors is likely to get squeezed even further to the margins.
For evidence of why this unfortunate trend should be bucked, look no further than National Geographic’s recent “This Is Your Brain on Nature”story. David Strayer, a cognitive psychologist at the University of Utah who specializes in attention, told National Geographic that spending just three days outside “is a kind of cleaning of the mental windshield that occurs when we’ve been immersed in nature long enough.”
“If you can have the experience of being in the moment for two or three days, it seems to produce a difference in qualitative thinking,” he said.
In the same article, Lisa Nisbet, a psychology professor at Canada’s Trent University, said that “people underestimate the happiness effect” of being outdoors.
“We don’t think of it as a way to increase happiness,” she said. “We think other things will, like shopping or TV. We evolved in nature. It’s strange we’d be so disconnected.”
When considering spending time outdoors and reconnecting with nature, it helps to remember that simply being outside isn’t the equivalent of being in nature. And the benefits can vary.
A study this summer found that walking on quiet, tree-lined paths encouraged people to think more positively and ruminate less than walking along busy highways and roads.
Gregory Bratman, a graduate student at the Emmett Interdisciplinary Program in Environment and Resources at Stanford University and co-author of the study, told the New York Times the results “strongly suggest that getting out into natural environments” could be an easy and almost immediate way to improve moods for those living in cities.
With more than half the world now living in urban areas—a percentage that is expected to increase to more than two-thirds by 2050—finding ways to get outside and enjoy nature will become increasingly important, especially considering how much of modern life revolves around screen time. One recent report found that children aged five to 16 spend an average of six and a half hours a day in front of a screen. Other reports put this number at over seven hours a day. Just 20 years ago in 1995, that number was closer to three hours.
As the National Wildlife Federation puts it, “this shift inside profoundly impacts the wellness of our nation’s kids:”
Childhood obesity rates have more than doubled the last 20 years; the United States has become the largest consumer of ADHD medications in the world; and pediatric prescriptions for antidepressants have risen precipitously.
Our kids are out of shape, tuned out and stressed out, because they’re missing something essential to their health and development: connection to the natural world.
One additional benefit of being in nature: it’s time not spent staring at a screen.
A study published this year in the journal Frontiers in Psychology looked at four ways contact with nature seems to promote human health: air quality, physical activity, stress reduction, and social integration.
“Time spent in and around tree-lined streets, gardens, parks, and forested and agricultural lands is consistently linked to objective, long-term health outcomes,” wrote Ming Kuo, associate professor of natural resources and environmental sciences at University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign and author of the study.
In identifying the mechanisms underlying this link, Kuo came up with 21 pathways, “each of which has been empirically tied to nature and has implications for specific physical and mental health outcomes.”