An independent team of scientists renewed its criticism of Gov. Jerry Brown’s twin tunnels plan this week, saying that the massive documents justifying the project are “incomplete and opaque.”
The Delta Independent Science Board isn’t judging whether the $15 billion tunnels are a good idea or a bad idea.
Rather, the board is criticizing the environmental documents that are supposed to explain — to experts and the general public — what benefits the tunnels would provide and what impacts they might have.
And to that end, the report falls short, the scientists said.
“We do not attempt to determine whether this report fulfills the letter of the law,” they wrote in their 21-page comment letter. “But we find the current draft sufficiently incomplete and opaque to deter its evaluation and use by decision-makers, resource managers, scientists and the broader public.”
Last year the scientists questioned a previous version of the tunnels plan. The latest version is better, they said, but many of the same problems remain.